New Mexico Supreme Court Rules Body Camera Confession Inadmissible
The New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that body camera footage showing Alexee Trevizo confessing to placing a newborn in a trash can cannot be used as evidence in her trial. The court cited physician-patient privilege and Trevizo's compromised medical condition…
Charlotte, NC, August 2, 2026 —
The New Mexico Supreme Court has ruled that body camera footage capturing Alexee Trevizo’s confession, in which she admitted to placing a newborn in a trash can, cannot be admitted as evidence in her upcoming trial.
The decision to suppress the confession was based on two primary factors cited by the court: physician-patient privilege and the compromised medical condition of Trevizo at the time the confession was made. The court determined that Trevizo’s statements were made under circumstances that render them privileged and therefore inadmissible.
The body camera footage in question reportedly shows Trevizo detailing the events leading to the infant’s discovery. However, the state’s high court has now upheld a lower court’s decision to exclude this crucial piece of evidence.
The legal proceedings surrounding this case have focused heavily on the admissibility of statements made by Trevizo, particularly those made while she was seeking or receiving medical care. The court’s ruling emphasizes the legal protections afforded to individuals in such sensitive situations.
Details regarding the specific nature of Trevizo’s medical condition at the time of the confession were not elaborated upon in the ruling but were cited as a significant factor in the suppression. The court’s application of physician-patient privilege suggests a finding that the statements were made in a context where such privilege would typically apply, potentially during or shortly after medical examination or treatment.
The implications of this ruling mean that prosecutors will be unable to use Trevizo’s own words, as captured on body camera, to build their case regarding the alleged actions. This may necessitate a shift in the prosecution’s strategy as they proceed with the trial. The contractor’s name was not provided. The fine amount was not provided.
Further proceedings in the trial will now proceed without this specific evidence. The New Mexico Supreme Court’s decision underscores the importance of legal standards governing the admissibility of confessions, especially when related to an individual’s medical status.
Story summarized from the original created by Amanda Alvarado on www.wbtv.com, see more information here.
